Inflammatory responses in esophageal mucosa before and after laparoscopic antireflux surgery.

BACKGROUND: Currently, the primary treatment for gastroesophageal reflux is acid suppression with proton pump inhibitors, but they are not a cure, and some patients don't respond well or refuse long-term use. Therefore, alternative therapies are needed to understand the disease and develop better treatments. Laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery (LARS) can resolve symptoms of these patients and plays a significant role in evaluating esophageal healing after preventing harmful effects. Successful LARS improves typical gastroesophageal reflux symptoms in most patients, mainly by reducing the exposure time to gastric contents in the esophagus. Amelioration of the inflammatory response and a recovery response in the esophageal epithelium is expected following the cessation of the noxious attack. AIM: To explore the role of inflammatory biomolecules in LARS and assess the time required for esophageal epithelial recovery. METHODS: Of 22 patients with LARS (pre- and post/5.8 ± 3.8 months after LARS) and 25 healthy controls (HCs) were included. All subjects underwent 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, during which esophageal biopsy samples were collected using endoscopic techniques. Inflammatory molecules in esophageal biopsies were investigated by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and multiplex-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: Post-LARS samples showed significant increases in proinflammatory cytokines [interleukin (IL)-1ß, interferon-γ, C-X-C chemokine ligand 2 (CXCL2)], anti-inflammatory cytokines [CC chemokine ligand (CCL) 11, CCL13, CCL17, CCL26, CCL1, CCL7, CCL8, CCL24, IL-4, IL-10], and homeostatic cytokines (CCL27, CCL20, CCL19, CCL23, CCL25, CXCL12, migration inhibitory factor) compared to both HCs and pre-LARS samples. CCL17 and CCL21 levels were higher in pre-LARS than in HCs (P < 0.05). The mRNA expression levels of AKT1, fibroblast growth factor 2, HRAS, and mitogen-activated protein kinase 4 were significantly decreased post-LARS vs pre-LARS. CCL2 and epidermal growth factor gene levels were significantly increased in the pre-LARS compared to the HCs (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The presence of proinflammatory proteins post-LARS suggests ongoing inflammation in the epithelium. Elevated homeostatic cytokine levels indicate cell balance is maintained for about 6 months after LARS. The anti-inflammatory response post-LARS shows suppression of inflammatory damage and ongoing postoperative recovery.

Prokinetics-safety and efficacy: The European Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility/The American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society expert review.

BACKGROUND: Prokinetics are a class of pharmacological drugs designed to improve gastrointestinal (GI) motility, either regionally or across the whole gut. Each drug has its merits and drawbacks, and based on current evidence as high-quality studies are limited, we have no clear recommendation on one class or other. However, there remains a large unmet need for both regionally selective and/or globally acting prokinetic drugs that work primarily intraluminally and are safe and without systemic side effects. PURPOSE: Here, we describe the strengths and weaknesses of six classes of prokinetic drugs, including their pharmacokinetic properties, efficacy, safety and tolerability and potential indications.

Roles of Cytokines in Pathological and Physiological Gastroesophageal Reflux Exposure.

Background/Aims: Gastroesophageal reflux disease is frequently observed and has no definitive treatment. There are 2 main views on the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. The first is that epithelial damage starts from the mucosa by acidic-peptic damage and the inflammatory response of granulocytes. The other view is that T-lymphocytes attract chemoattractants from the basal layer to the mucosa, and granulocytes do not migrate until damage occurs. We aim to investigate the inflammatory processes occurring in the esophageal epithelium of the phenotypes at the molecular level. We also examined the effects of these changes on tissue integrity. Methods: Patients with mild and severe erosive reflux, nonerosive reflux, reflux hypersensitivity, and functional heartburn were included. Inflammatory gene expressions (JAK/STAT Signaling and NFKappaB Primer Libraries), chemokine protein levels, and tissue integrity were examined in the esophageal biopsies. Results: There was chronic inflammation in the severe erosion group, the acute response was also triggered. In the mild erosion group, these 2 processes worked together, but homeostatic cytokines were also secreted. In nonerosive groups, T-lymphocytes were more dominant. In addition, the inflammatory response was highly triggered in the reflux hypersensitivity and functional heartburn groups, and it was associated with physiological reflux exposure and sensitivity. Conclusions: "Microinflammation" in physiological acid exposure groups indicate that even a mild trigger is sufficient for the initiation and progression of inflammatory activity. Additionally, the anti-inflammatory cytokines were highly increased. The results may have a potential role in the treatment of heartburn symptoms and healing of the mucosa.

Revisiting the Role of Esophageal Mucosal Dilated Intercellular Spaces in the Diagnosis and Pathophysiology of Heartburn.

Background/Aims: Dilated intercellular spaces (DISs) facilitate the diffusion of noxious agents into the deep layers of the esophageal epithelium. The role of DIS in heartburn pathogenesis is still controversial. Therefore, we aim to reinvestigate DIS in an extensively evaluated group of patients and healthy controls (HCs). Methods: We classified 149 subjects into the following groups: 15 HC, 58 mild erosive reflux disease (ERD), 17 severe ERD, 25 nonerosive reflux disease (NERD), 15 reflux hypersensitivity (RH), and 19 functional heartburn (FH). A total of 100 length measurements were performed for each patient's biopsy. Results: The overall intercellular spaces (ISs) value of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients was higher than that of HC (P = 0.020). In phenotypes, mild ERD (vs HC [P = 0.036], NERD [P = 0.004], RH [P = 0.014]) and severe ERD (vs HC [P = 0.002], NERD [P < 0.001], RH [P = 0.001], FH [P = 0.004]) showed significantly higher IS. There was no significant difference between the HC, NERD, RH, and FH groups. The 1.12 µm DIS cutoff value had 63.5% sensitivity and 66.7% specificity in the diagnosis of GERD. There was a weak correlation (r = 0.302) between the IS value and acid exposure time, and a weak correlation (r = -0.359) between the IS value and baseline impedance. A strong correlation was shown between acid exposure time and baseline impedance (r = -0.783). Conclusions: Since the IS length measurement had better discrimination power only in erosive groups, it is not feasible to use in daily routine to discriminate other nonerosive phenotypes and FH. The role of DIS in heartburn in nonerosive patients should be reconsidered.

The Prevalence of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Azerbaijan: A Population-Based Cross-sectional Study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease in Azerbaijan has not been evaluated before. The aim of our study was to determine the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease based on the validated reflux questionnaire. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1026 individuals from 7 regions of Azerbaijan were included in the cross-sectional study conducted via face-to-face administration of the validated Mayo Clinic's gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire. Gastroesophageal reflux disease was diagnosed if an individual had heartburn and/or regurgitation occurring at least once a week. RESULTS: The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease in Azerbaijan was 22.7% with significant female predominance (26.1% vs. 15.3%; P < .0001). Gastroesophageal reflux disease was prevalent in 17% of those aged below 35 years; 22.7% of those in the age range 36-55 years, and 38.5% of those who are above 56 years, which, accordingly, indicates that gastroesophageal reflux disease becomes significant as age increased (P < .0001). Male respondents younger than 35 years had much lower rates of gastroesophageal reflux disease than in older groups (5.7% vs. 22.7%, P < .0001), whereas in females older than 55 years, age was a significant factor for increasing gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms (22.6% vs. 50%, P < .001). Reflux was observed in 18.1% of normal-weight respondents (body mass index 18.6-24.9), 25.6% of overweight (body mass index 25-29.9), and 30.4% of obese ( body mass index > 30) individuals (P = .001). Regarding marital status, the prevalence was the lowest in the single subjects' group (17%), close to average in the married group (23.8%), and the highest (41.7%) in divorced/widowed cases (P = .003). Stress significantly affected the gastroesophageal reflux disease distribution, affecting 59.4% of all respondents (P < .004). CONCLUSION: Gender, body mass index, increased age, marital status, and stress were precipitating factors of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Socioeconomic diversity, along with lifestyle/habits, did not play a crucial role in the gastroesophageal reflux disease prevalence distribution.

The Abdominal Ultrasonography Results of Cappadocia Cohort Study of Turkey Reveals High Prevalence of Fatty Liver.

BACKGROUND: There is limited data about the prevalence of frequent gastrointestinal diseases in developing parts of the world based on community-based screening studies. Therefore, we aimed to present the detailed transabdominal ultrasonography results of the previously completed Turkey Cappadocia cohort study, which included a population-based evaluation of gastrointestinal symptoms and diseases in adults. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in Cappadocia cohort. The transabdominal ultrasonography, anthropometric measurements, and disease questionnaires were applied to cohort persons. RESULTS: Transabdominal ultrasonography was performed in 2797 subjects (62.3% were female and the mean age was 51 ± 15 years). Among them, 36% were overweight, 42% were obese, and 14% had diabetes mellitus. The most common pathological finding in transabdominal ultrasonography was hepatic steatosis (60.1%). The severity of hepatic steatosis was mild in 53.3%, moderate in 38.8%, and severe in 7.9%. Age, body mass index, liver size, portal vein, splenic vein diameter, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia were significantly higher while physical activities were significantly lower in hepatic steatosis group. Ultrasonographic grade of hepatic steatosis was positively correlated with liver size, portal vein and splenic vein diameter, frequency of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and coronary artery disease. Hepatic steatosis was observed in none of the underweight, 11.4% of the normal weights, 53.3% of the overweight, and 86.7% of the obese subjects. The percentage of hepatic steatosis cases with normal weight (lean nonalcoholic fatty liver disease) was 3.5%. The rate of lean nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in the entire cohort was 2.1%. Regression analysis revealed male gender (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.2), hypertension (HR: 1.5), and body mass index (body mass index: 25-30 HR: 9.3, body mass index >30 HR: 75.2) as independent risk factors for hepatic steatosis. The second most common ultrasonographic finding was gallbladder stone (7.6%). In the regression analysis, female gender (HR: 1.4), body mass index (body mass index: 25-30 HR: 2.1, body mass index >30 HR: 2.9), aging (30-39 age range HR: 1.5, >70 years HR: 5.8), and hypertension (HR: 1.4) were the most important risk factors for gallbladder stone. CONCLUSIONS: Cappadocia cohort study in Turkey revealed a high prevalence of hepatic steatosis (60.1%) while the prevalence of gallbladder stones was 7.6% among the participants. The results of the Cappadocia cohort located in central Anatolia, where overweight and lack of physical activity are characteristic, showed that Turkey is one of the leading countries in the world for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Computer-Based Intelligent Solutions for the Diagnosis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Phenotypes and Chicago Classification 3.0.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a multidisciplinary disease; therefore, when treating GERD, a large amount of data needs to be monitored and managed.The aim of our study was to develop a novel automation and decision support system for GERD, primarily to automatically determine GERD and its Chicago Classification 3.0 (CC 3.0) phenotypes. However, phenotyping is prone to errors and is not a strategy widely known by physicians, yet it is very important in patient treatment. In our study, the GERD phenotype algorithm was tested on a dataset with 2052 patients and the CC 3.0 algorithm was tested on a dataset with 133 patients. Based on these two algorithms, a system was developed with an artificial intelligence model for distinguishing four phenotypes per patient. When a physician makes a wrong phenotyping decision, the system warns them and provides the correct phenotype. An accuracy of 100% was obtained for both GERD phenotyping and CC 3.0 in these tests. Finally, since the transition to using this developed system in 2017, the annual number of cured patients, around 400 before, has increased to 800. Automatic phenotyping provides convenience in patient care, diagnosis, and treatment management. Thus, the developed system can substantially improve the performance of physicians.

Epigenetic Alterations from Barrett's Esophagus to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a disease entity that is a sequela of chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease that may result in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) due to columnar epithelial dysplasia. The histological degree of dysplasia is the sole biomarker frequently utilized by clinicians. However, the cost of endoscopy and the fact that the degree of dysplasia does not progress in many patients with BE diminish the effectiveness of histological grading as a perfect biomarker. Multiple or more quantitative biomarkers are required by clinicians since early diagnosis is crucial in esophageal adenocancers, which have a high mortality rate. The presence of epigenetic factors in the early stages of this neoplastic transformation holds promise as a predictive biomarker. In this review, current studies on DNA methylations, histone modifications, and noncoding RNAs (miRNAs) that have been discovered during the progression from BE dysplasia to EAC were collated.

Face-to-face interviews versus Internet surveys: Comparison of two data collection methods in the Rome foundation global epidemiology study: Implications for population-based research.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The Rome Foundation Global Epidemiology Study (RFGES) assessed the prevalence, burden, and associated factors of Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction (DGBI) in 33 countries around the world. Achieving worldwide sampling necessitated use of two different surveying methods: In-person household interviews (9 countries) and Internet surveys (26 countries). Two countries, China and Turkey, were surveyed with both methods. This paper examines the differences in the survey results with the two methods, as well as likely reasons for those differences. METHODS: The two RFGES survey methods are described in detail, and differences in DGBI findings summarized for household versus Internet surveys globally, and in more detail for China and Turkey. Logistic regression analysis was used to elucidate factors contributing to these differences. RESULTS: Overall, DGBI were only half as prevalent when assessed with household vs Internet surveys. Similar patterns of methodology-related DGBI differences were seen within both China and Turkey, but prevalence differences between the survey methods were dramatically larger in Turkey. No clear reasons for outcome differences by survey method were identified, although greater relative reduction in bowel and anorectal versus upper gastrointestinal disorders when household versus Internet surveying was used suggests an inhibiting influence of social sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: The findings strongly indicate that besides affecting data quality, manpower needs and data collection time and costs, the choice of survey method is a substantial determinant of symptom reporting and DGBI prevalence outcomes. This has important implications for future DGBI research and epidemiological research more broadly.

Dyssynergic Defecation: A Comprehensive Review on Diagnosis and Management.

About one-third of chronically constipated patients have an evacuation disorder, and dyssynergic defecation is a common cause of the evacuation disorder. In dyssynergic defecation, the coordination between abdominal and pelvic floor muscles during defecation is disrupted and patients cannot produce a normal bowel movement. The etiology of dyssynergic defecation is still unknown. Although a detailed history taking and a careful examination including digital rectal examination could be useful, other modalities such as anorectal manometry and balloon expulsion test are necessary for the diagnosis. Biofeedback therapy is one of the most effective and safe treatments. Here, we provide an overview of dyssynergic defecation as well as how to diagnose and manage this condition.

Functional bowel disorders with diarrhoea: Clinical guidelines of the United European Gastroenterology and European Society for Neurogastroenterology and Motility.

Irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea (IBS-D) and functional diarrhoea (FDr) are the two major functional bowel disorders characterized by diarrhoea. In spite of their high prevalence, IBS-D and FDr are associated with major uncertainties, especially regarding their optimal diagnostic work-up and management. A Delphi consensus was performed with experts from 10 European countries who conducted a literature summary and voting process on 31 statements. Quality of evidence was evaluated using the grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation criteria. Consensus (defined as >80% agreement) was reached for all the statements. The panel agreed with the potential overlapping of IBS-D and FDr. In terms of diagnosis, the consensus supports a symptom-based approach also with the exclusion of alarm symptoms, recommending the evaluation of full blood count, C-reactive protein, serology for coeliac disease, and faecal calprotectin, and consideration of diagnosing bile acid diarrhoea. Colonoscopy with random biopsies in both the right and left colon is recommended in patients older than 50 years and in presence of alarm features. Regarding treatment, a strong consensus was achieved for the use of a diet low fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides and polyols, gut-directed psychological therapies, rifaximin, loperamide, and eluxadoline. A weak or conditional recommendation was achieved for antispasmodics, probiotics, tryciclic antidepressants, bile acid sequestrants, 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 antagonists (i.e. alosetron, ondansetron, or ramosetron). A multinational group of European experts summarized the current state of consensus on the definition, diagnosis, and management of IBS-D and FDr.

In Vitro and In Vivo Effects of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Aspirin on Rabbit Esophageal Epithelium.

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease has a high incidence of 23%, with 29% of those with gastroesophageal reflux disease consuming nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. There are insufficient data concerning the effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on the esophageal tissue. We aimed to examine the effects of well-known nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs using electrophysiologic criteria on the rabbit esophageal epithelium. METHODS: Esophageal epithelium mounted on Ussing chambers enabled in vitro investigation of the electrophysiological properties. Doses of 1 mg/mL, 2.5 mg/mL, 5 mg/mL ibuprofen, naproxen, and aspirin were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide and added to the luminal side. Esophagi were cannulated from both sides for the administration of high-dose ibuprofen in vivo, and the potential difference was monitored. RESULTS: Ibuprofen and aspirin inhibited tissue transport functions in a dose-dependent manner. pH 4 acid and 0.1 mg/mL ibuprofen alone were not harmful; however, the combination of these agents had an additive and significance effect: 78% decrease in the potential difference and 85% decrease in the short-circuited current (Isc). The change in the potential difference in the in vivo experiments (5 mg/mL ibuprofen) was similar (52 ± 7% decrease) with in vitro experiments in the first 30 minutes. CONCLUSION: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were harmful to the rabbit esophageal epithelium in both the in vitro and in vivo experiments. Even though aspirin and ibuprofen affected the transport mechanisms of the esophageal epithelium, the dose-dependent decrease of tissue potential difference and Isc with ibuprofen was more pronounced than those with aspirin. The combination of harmless doses of ibuprofen and acid demonstrated that even low acidic conditions can create a disruptive environment.

Post COVID-19 irritable bowel syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: The long-term consequences of COVID-19 infection on the gastrointestinal tract remain unclear. Here, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms and post-COVID-19 disorders of gut-brain interaction after hospitalisation for SARS-CoV-2 infection. DESIGN: GI-COVID-19 is a prospective, multicentre, controlled study. Patients with and without COVID-19 diagnosis were evaluated on hospital admission and after 1, 6 and 12 months post hospitalisation. Gastrointestinal symptoms, anxiety and depression were assessed using validated questionnaires. RESULTS: The study included 2183 hospitalised patients. The primary analysis included a total of 883 patients (614 patients with COVID-19 and 269 controls) due to the exclusion of patients with pre-existing gastrointestinal symptoms and/or surgery. At enrolment, gastrointestinal symptoms were more frequent among patients with COVID-19 than in the control group (59.3% vs 39.7%, p<0.001). At the 12-month follow-up, constipation and hard stools were significantly more prevalent in controls than in patients with COVID-19 (16% vs 9.6%, p=0.019 and 17.7% vs 10.9%, p=0.011, respectively). Compared with controls, patients with COVID-19 reported higher rates of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) according to Rome IV criteria: 0.5% versus 3.2%, p=0.045. Factors significantly associated with IBS diagnosis included history of allergies, chronic intake of proton pump inhibitors and presence of dyspnoea. At the 6-month follow-up, the rate of patients with COVID-19 fulfilling the criteria for depression was higher than among controls. CONCLUSION: Compared with controls, hospitalised patients with COVID-19 had fewer problems of constipation and hard stools at 12 months after acute infection. Patients with COVID-19 had significantly higher rates of IBS than controls. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04691895.

High-Resolution Manometry Thresholds and Motor Patterns Among Asymptomatic Individuals.

OBJECTIVE: High-resolution manometry (HRM) is the current standard for characterization of esophageal body and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) function. We aimed to examine the prevalence of abnormal esophageal motor patterns in health, and to determine optimal thresholds for software metrics across HRM systems. DESIGN: Manometry studies from asymptomatic adults were solicited from motility centers worldwide, and were manually analyzed using integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), distal latency (DL), and distal contractile integral (DCI) in standardized fashion. Normative thresholds were assessed using fifth and/or 95th percentile values. Chicago Classification v3.0 criteria were applied to determine motor patterns across HRM systems, study positions (upright vs supine), ages, and genders. RESULTS: Of 469 unique HRM studies (median age 28.0, range 18-79 years). 74.6% had a normal HRM pattern; none had achalasia. Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) was the most frequent motor pattern identified (15.1% overall), followed by EGJ outflow obstruction (5.3%). Proportions with IEM were lower using stringent criteria (10.0%), especially in supine studies (7.1%-8.5%). Other motor patterns were rare (0.2%-4.1% overall) and did not vary by age or gender. DL thresholds were close to current norms across HRM systems, while IRP thresholds varied by HRM system and study position. Both fifth and 95th percentile DCI values were lower than current thresholds, both in upright and supine positions. CONCLUSIONS: Motor abnormalities are infrequent in healthy individuals and consist mainly of IEM, proportions of which are lower when using stringent criteria in the supine position. Thresholds for HRM metrics vary by HRM system and study position.

Pepsin and pH of Gastric Juice in Patients With Gastrointestinal Reflux Disease and Subgroups.

GOAL: The aim of this study was to investigate the pepsin values and pH results of gastric juice among the subtypes of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and functional heartburn. BACKGROUND: The major destructive agents of GERD on the esophageal epithelium are gastric acid and pepsin. No precise information about pepsin concentration in gastric juice exists. STUDY: Ninety patients with GERD, 39 erosive reflux disease (ERD) Los Angeles (LA) grade A/B, 13 ERD LA grade C/D, 19 nonerosive reflux disease (NERD), 8 esophageal hypersensitivity, 11 functional heartburn, and 24 healthy controls were included in the study. During endoscopy gastric juices from the patients were aspirated and their pH readings immediately recorded. Gastric juice samples were analyzed using Peptest, a lateral flow device containing 2 unique human monoclonal antibodies to detect any pepsin present in the gastric juice sample. RESULTS: The highest mean gastric pepsin concentration (0.865 mg/mL) and the lowest median gastric pH (1.4) was observed in the LA grade C/D group compared with the lowest mean gastric pepsin concentration (0.576 mg/mL) and the highest median gastric pH (2.5) seen in the NERD group. Comparing pH, the NERD patient group was significantly higher (P=0.0018 to P=0.0233) when compared with all other GERD patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: The basal gastric pepsin level in the healthy control group was comparable to literature values. There was good correlation and a significant linear relationship between the gastric pepsin level and gastric pH within the patient groups. The severity of the GERD disease is related to the lowest pH and the highest pepsin concentration in gastric juice.

Prevalence of Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection: Results of the Prospective Controlled Multinational GI-COVID-19 Study.

INTRODUCTION: Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in coronavirus-19 disease (COVID-19) have been reported with great variability and without standardization. In hospitalized patients, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of GI symptoms, factors associated with their occurrence, and variation at 1 month. METHODS: The GI-COVID-19 is a prospective, multicenter, controlled study. Patients with and without COVID-19 diagnosis were recruited at hospital admission and asked for GI symptoms at admission and after 1 month, using the validated Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale questionnaire. RESULTS: The study included 2036 hospitalized patients. A total of 871 patients (575 COVID+ and 296 COVID-) were included for the primary analysis. GI symptoms occurred more frequently in patients with COVID-19 (59.7%; 343/575 patients) than in the control group (43.2%; 128/296 patients) (P < 0.001). Patients with COVID-19 complained of higher presence or intensity of nausea, diarrhea, loose stools, and urgency as compared with controls. At a 1-month follow-up, a reduction in the presence or intensity of GI symptoms was found in COVID-19 patients with GI symptoms at hospital admission. Nausea remained increased over controls. Factors significantly associated with nausea persistence in COVID-19 were female sex, high body mass index, the presence of dyspnea, and increased C-reactive protein levels. DISCUSSION: The prevalence of GI symptoms in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 is higher than previously reported. Systemic and respiratory symptoms are often associated with GI complaints. Nausea may persist after the resolution of COVID-19 infection.

Efficacy of pinaverium bromide in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Spasmolytic agents are an attractive first line treatment option for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Pinaverium bromide (pinaverium) has antispasmodic effects on gastrointestinal smooth muscle and can relieve major IBS symptoms, but an up-to-date meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of pinaverium with placebo is lacking. The aim is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of pinaverium compared with placebo for IBS treatment. METHODS: All placebo-controlled trials evaluating pinaverium for IBS treatment were included, up to October 2019. Treatment efficacy was evaluated by overall patient IBS symptoms. Individual symptoms were also evaluated. The effect of pinaverium versus placebo was expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD) and risk ratio (RR). Odds ratio (OR) and number needed to treat (NNT) were also calculated. RESULTS: Eight studies were included for analysis. Pinaverium treatment had a beneficial effect on overall IBS symptom relief with a positive SMD of 0.64 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-0.82, p < 0.0001] and a positive RR of 1.75 (1.26-2.43, p < 0.0008). No significant difference was found by publication year, gender, age, methodological quality score (MQS), or sample size. No publication bias was detected. OR was 3.43 (2.00-5.88, p < 0.0001), and NNT was 4. Pinaverium also demonstrated a beneficial treatment effect for abdominal pain, stool change, and bloating improvement or resolution. CONCLUSION: Pinaverium is superior to placebo for the treatment of IBS symptoms, irrespective of patient age or gender, study publication year, sample size, or MQS. The NNT in this meta-analysis is amongst the lowest for studies and meta-analyses of antispasmodics versus placebo in IBS.

United European Gastroenterology (UEG) and European Society for Neurogastroenterology and Motility (ESNM) consensus on functional dyspepsia.

BACKGROUND: Functional dyspepsia (FD) is one of the most common conditions in clinical practice. In spite of its prevalence, FD is associated with major uncertainties in terms of its definition, underlying pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. METHODS: A Delphi consensus was initiated with 41 experts from 22 European countries who conducted a literature summary and voting process on 87 statements. Quality of evidence was evaluated using the grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Consensus (defined as >80% agreement) was reached for 36 statements. RESULTS: The panel agreed with the definition in terms of its cardinal symptoms (early satiation, postprandial fullness, epigastric pain, and epigastric burning), its subdivision into epigastric pain syndrome and postprandial distress syndrome, and the presence of accessory symptoms (upper abdominal bloating, nausea, belching), and overlapping conditions. Also, well accepted are the female predominance of FD, its impact on quality of life and health costs, and acute gastrointestinal infections, and anxiety as risk factors. In terms of pathophysiological mechanisms, the consensus supports a role for impaired gastric accommodation, delayed gastric emptying, hypersensitivity to gastric distention, Helicobacter pylori infection, and altered central processing of signals from the gastroduodenal region. There is consensus that endoscopy is mandatory for establishing a firm diagnosis of FD, but that in primary care, patients without alarm symptoms or risk factors can be managed without endoscopy. There is consensus that H. pylori status should be determined in every patient with dyspeptic symptoms and H. pylori positive patients should receive eradication therapy. Also, proton pump inhibitor therapy is considered an effective therapy for FD, but no other treatment approach reached a consensus. The long-term prognosis and life expectancy are favorable. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: A multinational group of European experts summarized the current state of consensus on the definition, diagnosis and management of FD.

Validation of the Reflux Disease Questionnaire for a Turkish Population.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Achieving the correct diagnosis and therapeutic success in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) depends on the patient's self-assessment. Therefore, valid and reliable patient-reported questionnaires are very important. When designing such measurement tools, researchers should focus on their validity, reliability, sensitivity, and, applicability. The reflux disease questionnaire (RDQ) largely meets these important requirements. This study aims to examine The RDQ's psychometric characteristics for the Turkish society (RDQ TR ) and its validity in symptoms' evaluation. METHODS: The sample of this study comprised 81 patients who were admitted to our institution, GERD study group outpatient clinic. The data collection forms used in the study were the case report forms and RDQ. Three weeks after the first interview, 30 patients were re-interviewed by the phone and the RDQ was re-administered. For the validity studies of the scale, language validity, content validity, and construct validity studies were used, and for the reliability studies, internal consistency and test-retest reliability methods were used. RESULTS: The content validity index of form was 0.95 (0.93-0.98). The performed factor analysis indicated 3 factors with an eigenvalue over 1.0. Those factors were responsible for 77.66% of the variance. The Cronbach's alpha values were 0.88 for regurgitation sub-dimension, 0.91 for dyspepsia sub-dimension, 0.86 for heartburn sub-dimension, and 0.92 overall. Intraclass correlation coefficient value of the scale was 0.94. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights that the RDQ TR is reliable, valid, and responsive to change in Turkey patients with GERD symptomatology.

United European Gastroenterology (UEG) and European Society for Neurogastroenterology and Motility (ESNM) consensus on functional dyspepsia.

BACKGROUND: Functional dyspepsia (FD) is one of the most common conditions in clinical practice. In spite of its prevalence, FD is associated with major uncertainties in terms of its definition, underlying pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. METHODS: A Delphi consensus was initiated with 41 experts from 22 European countries who conducted a literature summary and voting process on 87 statements. Quality of evidence was evaluated using the grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Consensus (defined as >80% agreement) was reached for 36 statements. RESULTS: The panel agreed with the definition in terms of its cardinal symptoms (early satiation, postprandial fullness, epigastric pain, and epigastric burning), its subdivision into epigastric pain syndrome and postprandial distress syndrome, and the presence of accessory symptoms (upper abdominal bloating, nausea, belching), and overlapping conditions. Also, well accepted are the female predominance of FD, its impact on quality of life and health costs, and acute gastrointestinal infections, and anxiety as risk factors. In terms of pathophysiological mechanisms, the consensus supports a role for impaired gastric accommodation, delayed gastric emptying, hypersensitivity to gastric distention, Helicobacter pylori infection, and altered central processing of signals from the gastroduodenal region. There is consensus that endoscopy is mandatory for establishing a firm diagnosis of FD, but that in primary care, patients without alarm symptoms or risk factors can be managed without endoscopy. There is consensus that H. pylori status should be determined in every patient with dyspeptic symptoms and H. pylori positive patients should receive eradication therapy. Also, proton pump inhibitor therapy is considered an effective therapy for FD, but no other treatment approach reached a consensus. The long-term prognosis and life expectancy are favorable. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: A multinational group of European experts summarized the current state of consensus on the definition, diagnosis and management of FD.